• To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 17:18:12 -0500
• In-reply-to: <3E46C1AD.9000904@d...>
• References: <E18hflf-0005tD-00@b...> <oprka239fuezizxn@localhost><3E46C1AD.9000904@d...>

At 9:01 PM +0000 2/9/03, Bill de hÓra wrote:
>Mike Champion wrote:
>>   (BTW, in 1.2 "SOAP" is no longer an acronym, reflecting the
>>reality that SOAP never was an "access protocol" and does not
>>really have all that much to do with "objects.")
>
>Or being simple :)
>

I'm feeling a little verklempt! Talk amongst yourselves..I'll give
you a topic: the Simple Object Access Protocol is neither simple, nor
an object access protocol. Discuss. :-)

--
Rusty

• References:
  • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
    • From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?= <bill@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
• Next by Date: RE: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
• Previous by thread: Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
• Next by thread: Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread