Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> What I WANT as a result of current effort is a simple and not > necessarily > complete syntax that text editors and development tools will commonly > support as an alternate view of XML documents. But is the result an alternative view of XML syntax, or an alternative syntax of the XML Infoset? I think it's pretty much going to wind up being the latter, for better or worse. > What I DON'T WANT to see is this syntax being used to > exchange or store > data. Can you enforce that constraint? <g> BTW, I'm not arguing against your efforts; I'm pointing out what I see is a consequence of having the results of those efforts widely adopted. And you're not the only one working along such lines of reasoning. If we get a plethora of interchangeable syntaxes, then they have a common juncture to be coherent.
|
