Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
I assume Mike is talking about the fact that it is not possible to embed one well-formed document in another and still be conformant XML if the embedded document contains a prolog. One can resort to hacks to get around this (PIs or CDATA sections) but I assume some would rather have a "blessed" way of achieving this. -----Original Message----- From: Uche Ogbuji [mailto:uche.ogbuji@f...] Sent: Sun 2/2/2003 7:10 AM To: Mike Champion Cc: elharo@m...; xml-dev@l... Subject: Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services > XML 1.x is not > composable as specified, which makes the full spec unusable for a header- > extension model such as SOAP offers, and so on. (See the response by the > XMLP WG to this issue on www-tag a month ago for details). No. I'm not interested in seeing what the XMLP WG says in some formal round of mumbo-jumbo. If you want to put forth such a vacuous accusations as "XML 1.x is not composable as specified", please justify it here in language that proves it is not just a case of character assassination by quiddity.
|
