• To: Bill de hÓra <bill@d...>
• Subject: RE: The subsetting has begun
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 16:01:46 -0800
• Cc: "Jeff Lowery" <Jeff.Lowery@c...>,"Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <clbullar@i...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcLcXbgiZAu6tTJtRAWVTckmFVvTagAAkOeg
• Thread-topic: The subsetting has begun

Interesting. Why would I want to drop the 'XML' from http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset/ ? 

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
A bank is where they lend you an umbrella and then ask for it back when it begins to rain.                                 

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. 

>  
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill de hÓra [mailto:bill@d...] 
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 3:35 PM
> To: Dare Obasanjo
> Cc: Jeff Lowery; Bullard, Claude L (Len); xml-dev@l...
> 
> Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> >  However as many proposals for
> > alternate syntaxes for XML (including binary ones) have shown this 
> > doesn't mean that XML infosets necessarily have to be 
> > UnicodeWithAngleBrackets.
> 
> That infoset is an abstract content model, or a plain ole 
> syntax tree. Drop the 'XML'; it's superfluous.
> 
> Bill de hÓra
> 
> 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The subsetting has begun
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill@d...>
  • RE: The subsetting has begun
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: DOM support in IE vs. NS
• Next by Date: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Previous by thread: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Next by thread: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread