• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Subject: Re: Internal entities removed from XML?
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:44:43 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <00c601c2a796$7ac26b50$4bc8a8c0@A...>
• References: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B7C752@R...> <oprhnu8kjdezizxn@s...> <009801c2a791$8c325300$4bc8a8c0@A...> <3E021C80.60207@d...> <00c601c2a796$7ac26b50$4bc8a8c0@A...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

> It is not clear to me that it would be any faster, since it involves branches
> that would never be taken if the data contained no user-defined entities.

You're probably a better coder than I am, but if I have "&f;" expanding 
to "foobar", and I want to implement in-place conversion, then I always 
have to have a "lookaside" place, and my read-from-the-source routine 
always has to look to see if the pushback is non-empty, etc.

	/r$

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Internal entities removed from XML?
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• References:
  • RE: Internal entities removed from XML?
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Re: Internal entities removed from XML?
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: Internal entities removed from XML?
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Internal entities removed from XML?
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
  • Re: Internal entities removed from XML?
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Internal entities removed from XML?
• Next by Date: Re: Internal entities removed from XML?
• Previous by thread: Re: Internal entities removed from XML?
• Next by thread: Re: Internal entities removed from XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread