• To: "Sam Hunting" <shunting@e...>
• Subject: Re: Common XML (was Re: Internal entities)
• From: "Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@c...>
• Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:53:24 -0800
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0212191327470.1461-100000@w...>

Sam:

> The way I express is this is that topic maps can "embrace and
> extend" ;-) any existing markup scheme. See e.g.:
> 
>     http://www.etopicality.com/presentations/KT_2002/omnivore.html
> 
> tmtk, the topic map toolkit available at www.gooseworks.org, includes an
> implementation of this approach, based on the draft ISO Reference Model
> (the RM) for topic maps.

Great staff! 
To add to this, most of TM vendors have similar solutions.
Also Kal's open source Metadata Processing Framework is available [1]: 
I myself proposed a stylesheet framework at KT2001 [2], 
which I am successfully implementing ever since, it works great!

[1] http://www.techquila.com/mdf.html
[2] http://www.cogx.com/kt2001/

--Nikita.

Nikita Ogievetsky, nogievet@c...;
Cogitech Inc.        http://www.cogx.com   
Topic Maps Tutorials and Consulting. 
phone:  1 (917) 406 - 8734      

• References:
  • Re: Common XML (was Re: Internal entities)
    • From: Sam Hunting <shunting@e...>

• Prev by Date: TagSoup, an Open Source SAX parser in Java for nasty, ugly HTML
• Next by Date: A Data Model for Strongly Typed XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Common XML (was Re: Internal entities)
• Next by thread: Re: Internal entities removed from XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread