• To: "'G. Ken Holman'" <gkholman@C...>, "'Xml-Dev'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: HTML Canonicalization?
• From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 11:37:01 -0800
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.0.20021209195409.03077918@p...>
• Organization: Docuverse
• Reply-to: <donpark@d...>

I suppose using a specific version and configuration of Tidy could
potentially work along with XML-Signature, but I am looking for something
more formal.

Best,

Don Park
Docuverse

> -----Original Message-----
> From: G. Ken Holman [mailto:gkholman@C...]
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 4:55 PM
> To: Xml-Dev
> Subject: Re:  HTML Canonicalization?
> 
> At 2002-12-09 15:29 -0800, Don Park wrote:
> >I am looking for references to past or present work on HTML
> canonicalization
> >similar to XML C14N spec but for HTML.  Please let me know if you know of
> >any.
> 
> Would tidy work for you as a tool?
> 
>      http://tidy.sourceforge.net/
> 
> ................ Ken

• References:
  • Re: HTML Canonicalization?
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>

• Prev by Date: OFFTOPIC: Microsoft to offer Linux?
• Next by Date: XML on GENTRAN
• Previous by thread: Re: HTML Canonicalization?
• Next by thread: Patterns for encoding simple type validation results
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread