Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Maybe most of the gentry and royalty have left the list - talk of revolution and guillotines probably doesn't help - but xml-dev seems to have gone over pretty thoroughly to the position Uche described as bohemian. There are certainly document folks around, but there are also lots of people who work with data and even think in terms of data, but who value XML's labeled but untyped textual foundations. It makes me feel more optimistic than I have in a while, though I also worry that this is simply a place where bohemians congregate. Where do we go from here? davidc@n... (David Carlisle) writes: >It is lost because Xquery views the stated typing as more important >than the XML markup. It is essentially not an XML processing language >at all; it is language for querying typed trees. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
