• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: RE: nested namespaces
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 20:50:29 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1022-5BF09ABA112211D7B23F0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>

Unh, okay, it's boneheaded to wrap an XML document in a messaging wrapper
when not doing the messaging.

Those wacky blogger kids think it'll help 'em, so be it.
	/r$

• References:
  • RE: nested namespaces
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: CNet focusses on the negative
• Next by Date: Re: W3C Schema substitution-group question - the files
• Previous by thread: RE: nested namespaces
• Next by thread: RE: nested namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread