• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Namespace URI question
• From: "Bill Kearney" <wkearney99@h...>
• Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 09:26:40 -0500
• References: <879123D97A01D711B0F500508B4464E402776E@l...>
• Reply-to: "Bill Kearney" <wkearney99@h...>

> I came across this namespace declaration in a someone else's document (which
> I told him to change), but got stuck on the meaning of file:///foo.xsd.  I
> see now that the third slash means "localhost", which of course I should
> have known but I got mentally blocked on file path representations.  Now I'm
> back aboard the clue train.

Err, that's not consistent from browser to browser.  Esp wrt a windows box but
others mangle it as well.  Also, the namespace URI isn't required to reference a
resolvable document, it's just an identifier.  You're suggesting that the URI
here is resolvable to the actual XML schema document.  This is a fine idea but
not one others have been willing to support (for various religious reasons).
The least of which being if it's a schema document, what format?

-Bill Kearney

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Namespace URI question
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>

• References:
  • RE: Namespace URI question
    • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespace URI question
• Next by Date: Re: Namespace URI question
• Previous by thread: Re: Namespace URI question
• Next by thread: Re: Namespace URI question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread