• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: RE: Typing and paranoia
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 06:44:36 -0800
• Cc: "XML Dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcKdNP59j7t9MceLTtiWxgzdDm0HnAAALxy4
• Thread-topic: Typing and paranoia

Oh, you were saying that XML Schema uses XML 1.0 syntax? That doesn't seem like a big deal given the hundreds of markup dialects built with XML. I meant that W3C XML Schema describes how to constrain an XML Infoset not a document written using the XML 1.0 syntax. 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@i...] 
	Sent: Fri 12/6/2002 6:37 AM 
	To: Dare Obasanjo 
	Cc: XML Dev 
	Subject: RE:  Typing and paranoia
	
	

	Then why does it have a DTD?
	
	len
	
	-----Original Message-----
	From: Dare Obasanjo [mailto:dareo@m...]
	
	I'm not getting into this debate but just want to point out that W3C XML
	Schema is defined in terms of the Infoset not the XML 1.0 syntax.
	

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Typing and paranoia
    • From: Sam Hunting <shunting@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Typing and paranoia
• Next by Date: RE: Typing and paranoia
• Previous by thread: RE: Typing and paranoia
• Next by thread: RE: Typing and paranoia
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread