• To: michael.h.kay@n...
• Subject: Re: bohemians, gentry
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 08:05:44 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <002701c29c76$be2699f0$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
• References: <002701c29c76$be2699f0$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016

Michael Kay wrote:

> I think the status quo (and the most likely final outcome) is that the
> built-in types of XML Schema have to be supported, but user-defined
> types, and type-annotations on nodes, do not. In other words, processors
> must be able to cast strings to dates and numbers, and implement
> operations defined on those dates or numbers, but they don't have to
> support a schema processor that marks the contents of an element or
> attribute as a date or a number or a hat-size.

So it will probably be legal to ignore xsi: declarations?

  Paul Prescod

• References:
  • RE: bohemians, gentry
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: overrun with bohemians?
• Next by Date: RE: bohemians, gentry
• Previous by thread: RE: bohemians, gentry
• Next by thread: Re: bohemians, gentry
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread