• To: "martin@h..." <martin@h...>
• Subject: Re: General Public License for DTD and Schema
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 20:24:10 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0211220100020.1653-100000@f...>

> On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Rich Salz wrote:
> > sure, you can call it whatever you want, but GPL really means the Gnu
> > Public Licnese to "everyone."
>
> yeah?
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.html#GPL

The fact that the FSF uses the term GNU GPL doesn't, as you agree, make my
contention wrong.  Unless confusion is a goal, one should consider that
the GPL acronym is "taken."

	/r$

• References:
  • Re: General Public License for DTD and Schema
    • From: <martin@h...>

• Prev by Date: [ANN] RELAX NG Compact Syntax Utilities
• Next by Date: Re: The truth about standards...
• Previous by thread: Re: General Public License for DTD and Schema
• Next by thread: Re: General Public License for DTD and Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread