• To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>,<www-rdf-interest@w...>
• Subject: Topic Maps vs. RDF+DAML+OIL? RDF is inferior? What's RDF's value in the effort to Semantic Web?
• From: "Collin" <collin@s...>
• Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 13:51:00 +0800
• Cc: "Oscar Corcho" <ocorcho@f...>,"David Greiff" <david.greiff@i...>,<larsga@o...>
• Reply-to: "Collin" <collin@s...>

HI, rdf world:
    
    Garshol seems to be quite in favor of his Topic Maps in his paper "Topic maps, RDF, DAML, OIL:A comparison" (available at:http://www.ontopia.net/topicmaps/materials/tmrdfoildaml.html). 
    However, after looking into their diagram representations in light of Semantic Network, I found it is indeed that Topic Maps(TM) inherently precedes RDF family(RDF+DAML+OIL) and RDF is, at heart, a relative lower-level knowledge representation language with at least one level lost. 
    
    So what's RDF's value in the effort to Semantic Web? 
    
Collin
    

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Topic Maps vs. RDF+DAML+OIL? RDF is inferior? What's RDF's value in the effort to Semantic Web?
    • From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
• Next by Date: RE: Namespaces and XML Schema validation
• Previous by thread: RE: XML and XSLT help needed
• Next by thread: RE: Topic Maps vs. RDF+DAML+OIL? RDF is inferior? What's RDF's value in the effort to Semantic Web?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread