• To: clbullar@i... ("Bullard, Claude L (Len)")
• Subject: Re: dtds, schemas, xhtml, and multimedia technologies
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 11:21:30 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: pam@e... ('pam@e...'), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0DF857@h...> from "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" at Nov 11, 2002 10:04:09 AM

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit:

> 1.  DTDs are the easiest of the schema technologies to learn.  Really. 
> Compared to other candidates, the basics come quickly.   And in 
> XML, much easier than SGML.   Faster to type too.

Can't agree with you there.  RELAX NG has equally easy basics, more upside
potential, and its compact syntax is even faster to type than DTDs -- less
use of the Shift key.

-- 
I am expressing my opinion.  When my            John Cowan
honorable and gallant friend is called,         jcowan@r...
he will express his opinion.  This is           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
the process which we call Debate.                   --Winston Churchill

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: dtds, schemas, xhtml, and multimedia technologies
    • From: "Anthony B. Coates" <abcoates@T...>

• References:
  • RE: dtds, schemas, xhtml, and multimedia technologies
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: dtds, schemas, xhtml, and multimedia technologies
• Next by Date: RE: dtds, schemas, xhtml, and multimedia technologies
• Previous by thread: RE: dtds, schemas, xhtml, and multimedia technologies
• Next by thread: Re: dtds, schemas, xhtml, and multimedia technologies
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread