• To: "Mike Champion" <mc@x...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: RDDL/RDF - no RDF tax?
• From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>
• Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 15:02:19 -0500
• References: <00c801c28e52$7a011930$7c674544@n...> <oprf0lzak6ezizxn@localhost> <013701c28e73$0d648570$7c674544@n...>

Correction:
>
> that RDFXML makes the following assertions:
>
> <#foo> rdf:type rddl:resource .
> <#foo> rddl:nature <http://example.org/nature> .
> <#foo> rddl:nature <http://example.org/purpose> .
> <#foo> rddl:nature <http://example.org/L.dtd> .
> <#foo> rddl:prose "<p>A description of the 'L' language>"^^rdf:XMLLiteral
.
>

<#foo> rdf:type rddl:resource .
<#foo> rddl:nature <http://example.org/nature> .
<#foo> rddl:purpose <http://example.org/purpose> .
<#foo> rddl:related <http://example.org/L.dtd> .
<#foo> rddl:prose "<p>A description of the 'L' language>"^^rdf:XMLLiteral .

This is saying roughly that a namespace is a collection of resources, each
resource has a localname, a nature, a purpose and may be associated with a
related resource. A resource may have a text desctiption.

Jonathan

• References:
  • RDDL/RDF - no RDF tax?
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>
  • Re: RDDL/RDF - no RDF tax?
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: RDDL/RDF - no RDF tax?
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RDDL/RDF - no RDF tax?
• Next by Date: Re: RDDL/RDF - no RDF tax?
• Previous by thread: Re: RDDL/RDF - no RDF tax?
• Next by thread: Re: RDDL/RDF - no RDF tax?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread