• To: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@b...>
• Subject: Re: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic systems
• From: Joe Gregorio <joe@b...>
• Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 14:04:32 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <AOEKLHGMHIHGNIBEDMNMMENDDEAA.shelleyp@b...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530

Shelley Powers wrote:

>
>No seriously, my biggest concern recently is that there seems to be an
>assumption that those who are interested in RDF are seeking to replace
>straight XML uses with RDF/XML. 
>
You know what they say about making assumptions...
But when you see:

1. RSS 1.0 - Take an existing widely deployed format and refactor it to 
be RDF/XML.
2. This article:   http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/10/30/rdf-friendly.html
3. The attempted refactoring of RDDL to be RDF.

It certainly does 'look' like those who are interested in RDF are 
seeking to replace
straight XML uses with RDF/XML.

    -joe

--
http://bitworking.org
http://wellformedweb.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic systems
    • From: "Shelley Powers" <shelleyp@b...>
  • RE: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic systems
    • From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>

• References:
  • RE: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic systems
    • From: "Shelley Powers" <shelleyp@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: more QName madness
• Next by Date: Re: more QName madness
• Previous by thread: RE: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic systems
• Next by thread: RE: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic systems
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread