• To: "Dave Winer" <dave@u...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: RDF was a bully (was Re: RDF and the new releases)
• From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>
• Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 10:49:00 -0500
• References: <EBEPLGMHCDOJJJPCFHEFEEJOIHAA.danny666@v...> <02f501c28ce0$45132240$33a1dc40@murphy> <02c101c28d86$17cefb50$7c674544@n...>

Err
[[
but it's not correct to claim that RSS 1.0 is a hijacking of RDF, when it
actually harks back to RDF's roots --
]]

should be

...but it's not correct to claim that RSS 1.0 is a hijacking of _RSS_, when
it actually harks back to RDF's roots --

:-))

Jonathan

• References:
  • RE: RDF was a bully (was Re: RDF and the new releases)
    • From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>
  • Re: RDF was a bully (was Re: RDF and the new releases)
    • From: "Dave Winer" <dave@u...>
  • Re: RDF was a bully (was Re: RDF and the new releases)
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: more QName madness
• Next by Date: Draft Reference Model for Topic Maps
• Previous by thread: Re: RDF was a bully (was Re: RDF and the new releases)
• Next by thread: Re: RDF was a bully (was Re: RDF and the new releases)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread