• To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot? (was Re: dtds, schemas, xhtml, and multimedia technologies)
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:41:20 +1100
• References: <4QM05QM94FD4XBA3Z6164BYWLI6Z1.3dd08d25@MChamp> <3DD0B4C4.80406@p...>

From: "Paul Prescod" <paul@p...>

> Visualization tools are fine, but they should be visualizing the true 
> abstractions in the language you are "editing", not trying to hide them 
> from you with some thin, proprietary, quasi-abstraction layer.

Schneiderman's Direct Manipulation interface apparantly recommends

* continuous representation of the objects and actions of interest
* physical actions instead of complex syntax
* immediate and continuous feedback

I think there has been a general confusion that "physical actions
instead of complex syntax" somehow means "hiding the tags more" 
rather than "using the mouse more" (to put it a little simply.) 

Putting cost aside, one benefit of direct manipulation interfaces
is in presenting information in views that allow better physical 
manipulation. 

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• References:
  • Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot? (was Re: dtds, schemas,xhtml, and multimedia technologies)
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot? (was Re: dtds, schemas, xhtml, and multimedia technologies)
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot? (was Re: dtds, schemas, xhtml, and multimedia technologies)
• Next by Date: Re: Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot? (was Re: dtds, schemas, xhtml, and multimedia technologies)
• Previous by thread: Re: Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot? (was Re: dtds, schemas, xhtml, and multimedia technologies)
• Next by thread: Re: Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot? (was Re: dtds, schemas, xhtml, and multimedia technologies)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread