• To: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Subject: Re: Article: "The horror of XML". :)
• From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 14:59:32 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <4c.14269086.2af14649@a...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

AndrewWatt2000@a... wrote:
> But, what I want to know, is "Which of you guys are writing these alleged XML 
> parsers which don't require end tags?". :) Shame on you! :)

The Oracle XML parser had this *defect* for quite some time,
and it claimed to be the "fastest XML parser" (in some
category) around the same time.
Maybe this mutated into a feature after some passes of
hearsay...
(BTW I think they fixed it)

J.Pietschmann

• Prev by Date: Re: Problem with scope of <unique> in .NET XML schema classes?
• Next by Date: Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
• Previous by thread: Problem with scope of <unique> in .NET XML schema classes?
• Next by thread: Re: Problem with scope of <unique> in .NET XML schema classes?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread