• To: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Subject: Re: XHTML and OpenOffice
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 23:36:17 -0800
• Cc: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <EOEMKFKJILKOONCOJGEAKEHOEAAA.ann@w...>
• References: <EOEMKFKJILKOONCOJGEAKEHOEAAA.ann@w...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016

Ann Navarro wrote:

>
> The HTML WG, for lack of service elsewhere, HAS taken a "leadership 
> role" as others have suggested in quite a number of areas. When people 
> figure out that's what has happened, hysteria happens, and 18 months 
> later the bulk ofwhat we suggested gets implemented, under the guise 
> of someone else dreamingit up.

I'm not proposing to do something radical in a furtive way. I'm 
proposing the HTML WG look around for a problem that needs solving, 
write up a description of the problem and invent XHTML 2.0 as a solution 
to the stated problem.

  Paul Prescod

• References:
  • RE: XHTML and OpenOffice
    • From: "Ann Navarro" <ann@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML, Rich Internet Apps
• Next by Date: Re: XML, Rich Internet Apps
• Previous by thread: RE: XHTML and OpenOffice
• Next by thread: Re: XHTML and OpenOffice
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread