XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >
See What's New >
Buy Now >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

In a message dated 21/11/2002 19:53:15 GMT Standard Time, paul@p... writes:


I understand that Andrew Watt has got some people's backs up with his
questioning but I think that there is a legitimate question among the
rhetoric. (I think he's very misguided about browser development models
and some other issues, but anyhow...)


Ah, but I am working on you with my carefully reasoned arguments. <grin/> .... Maybe I can get you to move to "I *think* he's very misguided but there is maybe a 0.1% chance that there might be something in this ... ". :)


The question is: what problem with XHTML 1.0 in particular and the Web
in general is XHTML 2.0 supposed to solve?


I think that was pretty much one of the questions I was hoping to get answers to.

But, XHTML is actually at version 1.1.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xhtml11-20010531

The abstract and introduction
for XHTML 2.0 don't really say.


Absolutely.

Andrew Watt
"XHTML 2.0 - the W3C leading the Web to its full potential ... to implement yesterday's technology tomorrow"
XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >
See What's New in Stylus Studio >
Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member