• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 12:10:10 -0500
• In-reply-to: <72.2621b35e.2b0d1ad7@a...>

AndrewWatt2000@a... writes:
>I don't view XHTML 2.0 as "HTML".
>
>IE6 and below, Mozilla 1.x and below, Opera 7.x and below etc etc will
>continue to support *HTML*. I don't see that there is any realistic
>threat to HTML.

Legacy technologies merely persist.  To me, becoming a legacy technology
is very much a threat.

I still have no comprehension of why you think pulling the plug on XHTML
is remotely a good idea.
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...

• Prev by Date: Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• Next by Date: Universal Applications, Universal Data
• Previous by thread: Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• Next by thread: Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread