• To: <robin.berjon@e...>
• Subject: RE: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• From: "Ann Navarro" <ann@w...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:19:13 -0500
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3DDBAC1C.90908@e...>

-----Original Message-----
From: Robin Berjon [mailto:robin.berjon@e...]


The logic is quite simple:

   - AndrewWatt2000@a... can't refrain from posting ugly HTML to mailing
lists
   - XHTML 2.0 is a big improvement on ugly HTML
     => XHTML 2.0 will make several lists less painful to follow

---

Well, if there's no flamage to be found here, we'll just go dig it up
elsewhere, apparently:

'Andrew Watt
"XHTML 2.0 - the W3C leading the Web to its full potential ... to implement
yesterday's technology tomorrow"'

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • RE: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
    • From: "Gerben Rampaart (Casnet Mechelen)" <Gerben@C...>

• References:
  • Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
• Next by Date: RE: Why RDF is hard
• Previous by thread: Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• Next by thread: RE: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread