• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: The perils of P18S (was Re: Why RDF is hard )
• From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:14:20 -0800
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <E18DwMn-0002Hr-00@m...>
• Organization: Docuverse
• Reply-to: <donpark@d...>

> As such, I tend to see the ecent RDF-bashing as PC.  You seem to think
of
> RDF itself as PC.  See what I mean?  The term is useless.  Leave it
among
> the drags of unimaginative political punditry, where it belongs.

Uche,

You are confusing Common Sense with Political Correctness.  RDF is
butt-ugly, confusing, and useless in its current form.  After years of
TimBL and W3C pitching RDF hard, I have yet to see a single successful
application of RDF that couldn't be done without RDF. 

Its not the fire log that is wet, it's the damn match.

Don Park
Docuverse

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The perils of P18S (was Re: Why RDF is hard )
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • RE: The perils of P18S (was Re: Why RDF is hard )
    • From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>
  • RE: The perils of P18S (was Re: Why RDF is hard )
    • From: "bryan" <bry@i...>

• References:
  • Re: The perils of P18S (was Re: Why RDF is hard )
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RDDL/RDF - no RDF tax?
• Next by Date: Re: XML and XSLT help needed
• Previous by thread: Re: The perils of P18S (was Re: Why RDF is hard )
• Next by thread: RE: The perils of P18S (was Re: Why RDF is hard )
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread