• To: shelleyp@b... (Shelley Powers)
• Subject: Re: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:40:56 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: jcowan@r... (John Cowan), tbray@t... (Tim Bray), lists@a..., jonathan@o... (Jonathan Borden), mc@x... (Mike Champion), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <AOEKLHGMHIHGNIBEDMNMMEAIDFAA.shelleyp@b...> from "Shelley Powers" at Nov 18, 2002 11:32:32 AM

Shelley Powers scripsit:

> You know, I hate to say this, but this isn't much different than the
> RDF/XML, is it? 

No, it isn't.

> The primary difference really is that the namespace decorated XML element
> (and I'm aware that namespacing is a real issue with RDF/XML) is the
> property in RDF/XML, but Tim's syntax has only a PV element, with a P
> attribute containing the property and it's associated object value given an
> attributes. 

In addition, there are no XML literals, as I mentioned, and there are separate
base URIs for r's, p's, and v's.

-- 
Long-short-short, long-short-short / Dactyls in dimeter,
Verse form with choriambs / (Masculine rhyme):  jcowan@r...
One sentence (two stanzas) / Hexasyllabically   http://www.reutershealth.com
Challenges poets who / Don't have the time.     --robison who's at texas dot net

• References:
  • RE: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
    • From: "Shelley Powers" <shelleyp@b...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML / HTML Transport size
• Next by Date: 3 Weeks To Go -- XML 2002 Expo Gaining Momentum; 2nd XML Cup To Be Presented
• Previous by thread: RE: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
• Next by thread: Re: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread