• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XML/RDF
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 08:18:06 -0500
• In-reply-to: <019e01c28945$b19b9f30$7c674544@n...>

11/11/2002 12:46:31 AM, "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...> wrote:

>
>
>As an alternative to SNOMED consider OpenGALEN http://www.opengalen.org and
>note that this is also DL based.

I love their slogan - "Making the Impossible Very Difficult" :-)
Something tells me they didn't have a marketing consulting helping
them out with that one!

>
>So these are some of the problems that we face prior to our ability to use
>ontologies -- we need ontologies that we can freely use... sigh...

Sigh indeed.  The intellectual property nightmare rears its ugly head in
yet another domain.  

• References:
  • Re: XML/RDF
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: equivalentTo vs. XSLT
• Next by Date: Re: XML/RDF
• Previous by thread: Re: XML/RDF
• Next by thread: RE: XML/RDF
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread