• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>,xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: XML/RDF
• From: Bob DuCharme <bobdc@s...>
• Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 18:45:19 -0500
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0DF842@h...>

At 11/4/02 03:30 PM, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>I remember a thread on this list in which
>someone said it was easy to make an XML
>document "RDF friendly" and I asked how.
>John replied with a concise answer and no
>one seemed to object.

That's what's so funny about this current thread--John's reply to you 
(http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200208/msg01292.html) was precisely 
what inspired the article (and obviously, its title), and the article was 
essentially a padded version of that reply, with more examples and 
explanation and another guideline or two based on further reflection added. 
Simon even responded to that original set of guidelines 
(http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200208/msg01293.html), but only had 
a problem with the "Eschew mixed content" one at the time.

Bob DuCharme          www.snee.com/bob           <bob@
snee.com>  "The elements be kind to thee, and make thy
spirits all of comfort!" Anthony and Cleopatra, III ii
(bobdc e-mail address used only for mailing lists)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XML/RDF
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • RE: XML/RDF
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
• Next by Date: RE: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
• Previous by thread: RE: XML/RDF
• Next by thread: RE: XML/RDF
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread