• To: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@b...>
• Subject: Re: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:03:56 +0000
• Cc: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>, Tim Bray <tbray@t...>, lists@a..., Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>, Mike Champion <mc@x...>, xml-dev@l...
• Organization: Propylon
• References: <AOEKLHGMHIHGNIBEDMNMAEAFDFAA.shelleyp@b...>
• Reply-to: bill.dehora@p...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

Shelley Powers wrote:

> Sorry, John, but this one really doesn't work. The triples are meaningless
> unless we understand how to interpret same. 

That's what the model theory is for.


> Now, Tim's document is a just a quick blurb, but
> people are already adopting it as a holy grail. 

Who is?


> So what you're saying then, is that a person will have to know the RDF model
> in order to read and write Tim's RPV?

How could be any other way?

Bill de hÓra

• References:
  • RE: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
    • From: "Shelley Powers" <shelleyp@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
• Next by Date: Re: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
• Previous by thread: RE: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
• Next by thread: Re: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread