• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic systems
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 15:11:53 -0500
• In-reply-to: <EBEPLGMHCDOJJJPCFHEFIENMIHAA.danny666@v...>

danny666@v... (Danny Ayers) writes:
>Maybe so. But one of the reasons for that may be that many of the
>'straight XML uses' can be done a lot better in RDF.

For people who think in RDF, yes.

For people who think in XML, no.

Those of us who think in XML have plenty of reason to be cautious about
the good intentions of our RDF friends, I fear.

-------------
Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA
http://simonstl.com may be my URI
http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI
urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic systems
    • From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>

• References:
  • RE: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic systems
    • From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>

• Prev by Date: RE: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic systems
• Next by Date: Re: RDDL/RDF - no RDF tax?
• Previous by thread: RE: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic systems
• Next by thread: RE: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic systems
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread