• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: RDF was a bully (was Re: RDF and the new releases)
• From: "Dave Winer" <dave@u...>
• Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:45:08 -0800
• References: <200211151831.NAA24988@m...>

John Cowan said: "One could equally well say that RSS 0.91 hijacks the
RDF-compliant RSS 0.9.A plague o' both your houses. My company supports
both."

Yes, I've heard a lot of people say that, but it's not true.

0.90 was not in any way RDF-compliant.

About the plague on both your houses, that's why I don't want anything to do
with RDF. It got me involved with people who think in plague terms. Yuck.
All I wanted to do was build software and content around XML, not get
embroiled in these personal reputation-trashing flamewars.

Dave

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: RDF was a bully (was Re: RDF and the new releases)
    • From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>

• References:
  • Re: RDF was a bully (was Re: RDF and the new releases)
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: dtds, schemas, xhtml, and multimedia technologies
• Next by Date: Re: dtds, schemas, xhtml, and multimedia technologies
• Previous by thread: Re: RDF was a bully (was Re: RDF and the new releases)
• Next by thread: RE: RDF was a bully (was Re: RDF and the new releases)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread