• To: vdv@d... (Eric van der Vlist)
• Subject: Re: XML/RDF
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 14:15:57 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <1036436294.22314.1084.camel@ibook> from "Eric van der Vlist" at Nov 04, 2002 07:58:14 PM

Eric van der Vlist scripsit:

> I don't think that the purpose of this article was to be a propaganda or
> marketing kind of thing and I find that it does give a very accurate
> view of the restrictions of the RDF syntax together with practical and
> easy  guidelines to create XML vocabularies which can be processed with
> RDF tools.

Thanks, Eric.

Anyone who thinks I am a propagandist or a marketeer knows me but little.

-- 
John Cowan    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan   <jcowan@r...>
    "Any legal document draws most of its meaning from context.  A telegram
    that says 'SELL HUNDRED THOUSAND SHARES IBM SHORT' (only 190 bits in
    5-bit Baudot code plus appropriate headers) is as good a legal document
    as any, even sans digital signature." --me

• References:
  • RE: XML/RDF
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML/RDF
• Next by Date: Re: RE: XML/RDF
• Previous by thread: RE: XML/RDF
• Next by thread: Re: RE: XML/RDF
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread