• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 02:33:35 +1100
• References: <200211012310.SAA18464@m...> <009601c282f9$a0fce0f0$4bc8a8c0@A...> <3DC56D25.4020807@t...> <026601c283b6$31778c40$4bc8a8c0@A...> <3DC68D46.2050806@t...>

 From: "Tim Bray" <tbray@t...>
 
> I am maintaining the position 
> that constraining syntax is pretty well orthogonal to naming characters 
> and it is only due to the accident of DTD history that we have this idea 
> that it's inevitable that "schemas" do both. 

But, for example, MathML defines both elements and entities.
Would you regard it as a special case, pioneering?  

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• References:
  • Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
• Next by Date: RE: What is XML For?
• Previous by thread: Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
• Next by thread: Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread