• To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@c...>
• Subject: Re: more QName madness
• From: lists@a...
• Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 20:20:37 +0000
• Cc: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• References: <r01050400-1021-3DEB5B94F76511D69E4A0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]> <f5bwungsbwx.fsf@e...>
• Reply-to: lists@a...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

Henry S. Thompson wrote:

> The logic of this decision is as follows:  
> 
>   1) schemes are going to be popular (Simon himself has already
>      defined several);
>   2) short scheme names are likely to collide;
>   3) collision is an interop nightmare;
>   4) scheme names therefore need to incorporate domain names in some way;

4 doesn't follow. How about:

  4') scheme names therefore need to be unique in some way


Bill de hÓra

--
Propylon
www.propylon.com

• References:
  • more QName madness
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: more QName madness
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: Re: more QName madness
• Next by Date: Re: more QName madness
• Previous by thread: Re: more QName madness
• Next by thread: Re: more QName madness
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread