• To: "John Cowan" <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: RE: RDF and the new releases
• From: "Shelley Powers" <shelleyp@b...>
• Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:54:05 -0600
• Cc: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <200211151751.MAA24409@m...>

Sorry, John. Didn't specifically mean you,Bob, or your article in this
reference.

You were trying to _persuade_. I stand corrected on this one.

Shelley

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@r...]
> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:37 AM
> To: Shelley Powers
> Cc: Simon St.Laurent; xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  RDF and the new releases
>
>
> Shelley Powers scripsit:
>
> > Telling people
> > "Well, if you just do this and this and that and that and this and don't
> > forget to do _that_" to coerce them into ensuring their XML is
> > RDF-compliant, when they don't see a need or a purpose for it,
> is a mistake.
>
> Ahem.  I strongly object to your use of the word "coerce".  The
> intention of
> Bob duCharme and I was to _persuade_, a very different thing.
>
> --
> John Cowan                              <jcowan@r...>
> http://www.reutershealth.com            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
>                 .e'osai ko sarji la lojban.
>                 Please support Lojban!          http://www.lojban.org
>
>

• References:
  • Re: RDF and the new releases
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: RDF and the new releases
• Next by Date: RE: RDF and the new releases
• Previous by thread: Re: RDF and the new releases
• Next by thread: RE: RDF and the new releases
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread