• To: 'Richard Tobin' <richard@c...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: OT: Where did URI pipe symbol hack originate?
• From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:39:43 -0800

Hah!  We've got people looking at that same RFC and saying colons are
reserved!

Guess I'll have to read it now, and add my own intrepretation.  < :-(

Not that I don't trust you, Richard.   As Gorbachev once said, "Trust, but
verify."

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Tobin [mailto:richard@c...]
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:05 PM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  OT: Where did URI pipe symbol hack originate?
> 
> 
> >file:///C|/mydir/myfile.txt
> >
> >Having a little debate about whether the appropriate thing 
> is to escape the
> >colon with %xx instead of using the pipe (or colon).  Has a 
> consensus formed
> >that is (mostly) cross-platform compatible?
> 
> There's no good reason not to use a plain colon.  It's quite legal in
> path components (see RFC 2396).
> 
> -- Richard
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
> 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: OT: Where did URI pipe symbol hack originate?
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• Prev by Date: re: Malicious XML
• Next by Date: RE: XML/RDF
• Previous by thread: RE: OT: Where did URI pipe symbol hack originate?
• Next by thread: Re: OT: Where did URI pipe symbol hack originate?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread