• To: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Subject: Re: The RDDL challenge
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:54:58 -0800
• Cc: XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <3DDFC60B.9030702@t...>
• References: <3DDFC60B.9030702@t...> <1038241975.20033.821.camel@ibook>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016

Eric van der Vlist wrote:

> I thought RDDL was, like SAX, a xml-dev specification, isn't it the case
> any longer?

Hm, the TAG is interested and we think this is important stuff and we've 
invited discussion, and when we do that we're entitled to use our own 
mailing list :)  I don't think anybody's even started to think about 
process issues and where the standardization should be done. -Tim

• References:
  • The RDDL challenge
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: The RDDL challenge
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Excellent IETF BCP on XML
• Next by Date: RE: XML, Rich Internet Apps
• Previous by thread: Re: The RDDL challenge
• Next by thread: XML, Rich Internet Apps
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread