• To: "'Paul Prescod'" <paul@p...>,<AndrewWatt2000@a...>
• Subject: RE: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 09:39:18 -0000
• Cc: <ann@w...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3DDD3D03.6090101@p...>
• Reply-to: <michael.h.kay@n...>

> What resources in particular are you concerned about? If the 
> editors of 
> XHTML 2.0 were not working on XHTML 2.0, they might spend 
> their time at 
> the pub or in the hot-tub. That wouldn't advance the Web.
> 

But it might slow down its fragmentation.

Michael Kay

• References:
  • Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: [ANN] Lucid XML Toolkit new release
• Next by Date: RE: Representing Code Lists
• Previous by thread: Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• Next by thread: RE: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread