• To: Mike Champion <mc@x...>, Xml-Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: What is XHTML 2.0 for?
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:51:07 -0800
• In-reply-to: <3DDD3960.4020904@p...>
• References: <3DDD3960.4020904@p...> <oprf8awby7ezizxn@localhost>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016

Mike Champion wrote:

> Of course, the challenge is more to get implementations of what there
> is than to standardize all the innovations coming from the browser
> developers, but there still needs to be a strong XHTML activity to
> center this on.

Only if standardization is the bottleneck (which it seems not to be).

But anyhow, could we at least all agree that it would be good if XHTML 
had a clear mission statement and requirements document if only to 
prevent scope creep and so that people who do not follow the mailing 
lists closely would understand what is being accomplished?

  Paul Prescod

• References:
  • What is XHTML 2.0 for?
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: What is XHTML 2.0 for?
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: RE: What is XHTML 2.0 for?
• Next by Date: RE: What is XHTML 2.0 for?
• Previous by thread: Re: What is XHTML 2.0 for?
• Next by thread: RE: What is XHTML 2.0 for?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread