• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: how much complexity is unavoidable?
• From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)
• Date: 20 Nov 2002 17:01:31 +0000
• Cc: <michael.h.kay@n...>
• In-reply-to: <001401c29079$7a552c40$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
• References: <001401c29079$7a552c40$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7

"Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...> writes:

> > But my puzzlement is not over *why did Apache* create a more 
> > complex product than you or James Clark did. It is over the 
> > fact that *it is
> > possible* to create a product that is every bit as functional 
> > yet not as complex.
> > 
> 
> This doesn't puzzle me. Work expands to fill the time available.

You don't suppose there are companies that still judge programmers'
productivity by LOC counts?

Ari.

• References:
  • RE: how much complexity is unavoidable?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: HI
• Next by Date: Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• Previous by thread: RE: how much complexity is unavoidable?
• Next by thread: XML / HTML Transport size
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread