• To: danny666@v... (Danny Ayers)
• Subject: Re: RDF : Headless Triples syntax
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 21:26:18 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: jcowan@r... (John Cowan), xml-dev@l... (Xml-Dev), www-rdf-interest@w... (RDF-Interest)
• In-reply-to: <EBEPLGMHCDOJJJPCFHEFKENKIHAA.danny666@v...> from "Danny Ayers" at Nov 17, 2002 08:43:13 PM

Danny Ayers scripsit:

> I can understand the need for an <rdf:RDF> wall around embedded RDF in the
> current syntax (to keep its Gothic structure out of sight). If however the
> RDF was restricted to (decapitated) one-layer statements, I reckon an
> <rdf:D> ha-ha is adequate.

Actually, rdf:RDF isn't required, and Reuters Health doesn't use it.

-- 
John Cowan                              <jcowan@r...>
http://www.reutershealth.com            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
                .e'osai ko sarji la lojban.
                Please support Lojban!          http://www.lojban.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: RDF : Headless Triples syntax
    • From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>

• References:
  • RE: RDF : Headless Triples syntax
    • From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>

• Prev by Date: IRC XML Chat rooms
• Next by Date: Re: more QName madness
• Previous by thread: RE: RDF : Headless Triples syntax
• Next by thread: RE: RDF : Headless Triples syntax
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread