[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> >Sadly, my prediction that no-one would ever use XML Namespaces because
> >the whole idea was so unworkable is one of many occasions on which I
I don't think I understand what the alternative is. Is it this?
Element names don't matter but it can have multiple xmlns:type
attributes that have URI(s) describing the element?
If that's it, why is that better? Aliasing?
If that's not it, what is it?
/r$
|

Cart



