• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot?
• From: "Matt Gushee" <mgushee@h...>
• Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 13:56:58 -0700
• In-reply-to: <D60D8F448216D611A21A00508B62B5BC5E3A@e...>
• Priority: normal

On 13 Nov 2002 at 12:36, Jeff Lowery wrote:

> But, as you say, the debate is de facto lost anyhow.  Far be it from the
> likes of me to criticize a Recommendation authored by the perfectly enmeshed
> (enmashed?) intellects of close to 40 people, some of whom may have been
> subtly influenced by the syntax of a certain company's proprietary language.

If you mean VML, hasn't SVG existed longer? I have no idea what 
happened behind closed doors before the two languages appeared in  
public, but it seems to me I had heard of SVG by about 1998, 
whereas VML appeared with Windows 2000 or Office 2000. Or am I 
confused/ignorant?

--
Matt Gushee

• References:
  • RE: Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot?
    • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Embedding html in XML
• Next by Date: RE: Tablet PC ink is XML
• Previous by thread: RE: Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot?
• Next by thread: RE: Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread