• Subject: Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:26:31 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1022-937B84E7FC9311D696190003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>

simonstl@s... (Simon St.Laurent) writes:
>XML instead of XHTML

That should be "XML instead of HTML".  XHTML didn't exist at the start
of the time I was writing about, and XHTML is still only getting
started.

Maybe the world needs a Society for Creative Acronym Anachronism, but
that's awfully hard to say.
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
• Next by Date: RE: Namespaces and XML Schema validation
• Previous by thread: Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• Next by thread: RE: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread