[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


In a message dated 19/11/2002 15:03:03 GMT Standard Time, jcowan@r... writes:


AndrewWatt2000@a... scripsit:

> However, it doesn't seem to me that claims of universality which are a
> million miles from practical reality strengthens the case for RDF.

RDF is called a universal assertion language in the same sense that (Turing-
complete) programming languages are called universal: anything expressible
can be expressed.


Now there is a wonderful piece of circular logic. <grin/>

<hands_raised_in_surrender>I can't argue against it being true that "anything expressible can be expressed".</hands_raised_in_surrender> :)

I love some of the weirdnesses of computer science. What other discipline would put the root at the top of a tree? :)

Interestingly the "anything expressible can be expressed" to some degree mirrors biases which have existed in the biological and other sciences for centuries - what is measurable can be measured and (implicitly) what is measurable is what is important.

Perhaps in your context too the important simply can't be expressed? :)

Andrew Watt

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member