Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Yep. However, since packets are sniffable? I'm trying to envision how many ways it can be abused, for example, alteration en route to a target that believes what it is getting is safe to dereference. Yes, they would be nuts not to check the value, but do they always. Gotta be paranoid given the stakes and the times. This isn't 1993. I have this nervous feeling that in the 80/20, think small, dare to do less, philosophies, the URzedEverywhere implications aren't completely thought through and we have entered a historical timeframe where they have to be. len -----Original Message----- From: Miles Sabin [mailto:miles@m...] Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote, > So the issue is for the protocol designer to explicitly say ... what? Don't dereference it unless you need to and your trust it. Same as any other URI.
|
