• To: Jelks Cabaniss <jelks@j...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 10:11:48 -0800
• In-reply-to: <00a101c2911e$0797f200$6601a8c0@blackie>
• References: <00a101c2911e$0797f200$6601a8c0@blackie>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016

Jelks Cabaniss wrote:

> Paul Prescod wrote:
>
>
> >But perhaps XHTML can help with:
> >  * Richer linking primitives
>
>
> They're already here.  You just need a UA that groks them.  Download
> Mozilla 1.x or Opera 7 beta.  Make sure the Navigation Toolbar is
> enabled (preferably set to "Auto"), and if pages have the appropriate
>  in them, you will see the Next, Previous, Up, Top, Home,
> Contents, Search, Index, Chapter, etc. in the toolbar.

I'm familiar with these conventions but I'm not clear on whether there 
is a published standard for them anywhere. If not, that's where XHTML 
2.0 could help. A quick skim of XHTML 1 and HTML 4.0 turn up examples 
but no normative specifications.

  Paul Prescod

• References:
  • RE: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
    • From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The truth about standards...
• Next by Date: Re: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
• Previous by thread: RE: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• Next by thread: Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread