[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


 
 

I hope you and other members of the HTML [sic] Working Group will be able to find some arguments in support of XHTML 2.0.

Andrew Watt
"XHTML 2.0 - the W3C leading the Web to its full potential ... to implement yesterday's technology tomorrow"
  
 
---
 
What you clearly don't understand is that no one, myself, members of the HTML Working Group, any other working group, any other individual or organization, is required, honor bound, or in any other way should be motivated to respond to your demands for "justification" or arguments simply because you posted an email message.
 
As Uche so clearly pointed out, you seem to have no other purpose but to sit and poke at the work of others, without providing anything substantive of your own.  You do not have the right to demand the ability to waste other people's time.

Contribute in a meaningful way, which I've yet to ever see, and you may end up in dialog with the people you are trying to engage. Otherwise, you'll likely end up on a growing list of twit filters.
 
 Ann
 
 

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member