• To: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Subject: Re: The perils of P18S (was Re: Why RDF is hard )
• From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)
• Date: 18 Nov 2002 14:57:57 +0000
• Cc: mc@x..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <6f.3103dc69.2b0a5606@a...>
• References: <6f.3103dc69.2b0a5606@a...>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7

AndrewWatt2000@a... writes:

> Mike,
> 
> In designating this process P18S aren't you perhaps making an unwarranted 
> assumption about whitespace handling? :)
> 
> Some of us might consider P19S an altogether superior approach! :)

Would those be called whitespace supremacists?

Ari.

• References:
  • Re: The perils of P18S (was Re: Why RDF is hard )
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...

• Prev by Date: Re: The perils of P18S (was Re: Why RDF is hard )
• Next by Date: OT - Re: The perils of P18S (was Re: Why RDF ishard )
• Previous by thread: Re: The perils of P18S (was Re: Why RDF is hard )
• Next by thread: OT - Re: The perils of P18S (was Re: Why RDF ishard )
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread