• To: lists@a..., Shelley Powers <shelleyp@b...>
• Subject: Re: RDF and the new releases
• From: "m batsis" <mbatsis@n...>
• Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 01:29:50 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3DD6C499.30900@a...>
• Organization: Netsmart.gr
• References: <AOEKLHGMHIHGNIBEDMNMOEJFDEAA.shelleyp@b...> <3DD6C499.30900@a...>
• Reply-to: mbatsis@h...

On Sunday 17 November 2002 00:20, lists@a... wrote:

> Now, why would a working group see fit to define a entirely new
> syntax for tests cases when it alrady had a syntax?

They needed a syntax not as powerfull as n3 or whatever to do the test cases, 
otherwise coming up with impossible (but maybe irrelevant) test cases would 
be common.


> Scrap what exactly? RDF/XML is a serialization for RDF - it's not
> RDF.

Yes! I can't figure out why people focus on syntax without solving core 
problems before that. Perhaps the new test-case syntax is a temporary medium 
for that.

Regards,

Manos

• References:
  • RE: RDF and the new releases
    • From: "Shelley Powers" <shelleyp@b...>
  • Re: RDF and the new releases
    • From: lists@a...

• Prev by Date: Re: more QName madness
• Next by Date: Re: RDF and the new releases
• Previous by thread: Re: RDF and the new releases
• Next by thread: Re: RDF and the new releases
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread